How To Think Universal Without Being A Bitch Nigga

I’m universal in the same sense that a medical practitioner recognizes their place in the general practice of medicine. Yet, I wouldn’t go to any medical practitioner to have my teeth treated: I’d seek a dentist. I am a humanist, however, I specialize in helping humans of west Afrikan ancestry found in the US.

It should be understood that I believe whites to suffer from pangs of Self-hate in the same manner that Blacks. Insecurity is ubiquitous. It could be argued that the human not so involved with the illusion of security will always find them Selves inadequate in a miasma of vanity, as Iknaton might write. It is this insecurity, and the vanity of illusion(or possibly the illusion of vanity), that causes those humans more blessed by external conditions(ie better farm land, a possession of something deemed valuable, a family trained in a military skill) to be deemed more worthy of a particular respect. Whatever the environmental factors, the human hierachy of society follows that those with more possessions, or the ability to convince others that they have a right to what would then be referred to as possessions, tend to be regarded with awe. We see this in the founding of the United States as the phrase “We, the people” should be interpreted as “we the landed aristocracy.” It follows from such logic, that those white males that were not of privileged ranks would see it necessary by virtue of emotional reactions to insecurity such as envy or jealousy to work towards an abolishment of slavery, or whatever seperates them from regarding them Selves as men of distinction. Initially, the most suitable means to control the less privileged white male would be to place the entire race in a light that allows the lesser privileged to be placed higher on the social totem than another, and to give the notion of the American dream, the land of milk and honey bit. In effect, this killed two birds with one stone.

Soon, of course, the insecurities of those that accept insecurity and had no compunction displaying their envy public began to show. This fueled the abolitionists movements of the whites, although the white race would be forever tainted by the ideas of Jefferson and Darwin. Furthermore, the fear of insecurity tends to limit the degree of charity one is willing to bestow on one that not only is deemed inferior, but that deems one’s Self as inferior. People don’t just abdicate for the sake of altruism. In this lies the fulcrum of the universal race war, and it should be remembered that whites commit genocides referred to as ethnic cleansings among their own. The question of humanism lies upon one great question: if the white race of the US will not relinquish due authority and power in the form of tangible resources beyond reform policies, who will force white people to act according to principle? Should there not be a group of humanist dedicated to assisting the Black nation within the confines of a white overpower gain a reasonable portion of economy for them Selves? How can one be a humanist if they leave their own house full of worries and responsibilities to tend to the worries and responsibilities of those that seek to burn that humanist’s house down, rape the babies, and make them victims? How humane is that?